Hyperbolic rhetoric is what I often hear from Jesse Watters. But it is still not exactly the same as "straight up fascism, 1933 style." It may be closer to Italian fascism 1922 style. Remember, that appealed to Henry Ford. (American still drive Ford products, however.) It was only after the Declaration of War against Japan that Ford relented (a bit). To "gerrymander to the tilt" still recognizes there is a "tilt." It does not help to match hyperbolic rhetoric from Jesse since his main goal is to get people to watch Fox commentators. (Some people on Fox's actual news are not prone to such rhetorical tricks.) The rhetoric used by DNC Chair Ken Martin involves tropes that are not at all analytical. Dear Micah Erfan, it is not ultimately productive to "fight fire with fire." That is a partisan statement. To say it is "not about partisanship" and then use a metaphor about "fighting" for "our Constitution" ignores the fact the U.S. Constitution is flawed. My ACLU copy indicates there are 27 Amendments. Yet some think the so-called "founders" received the original Constitution from some kind of infallible source even though the so-called Revolution (or "civil war") of the 1770s and 1780s was based on hyperbolic rhetoric, not honest legal arguments that would have stood up in court. The cat came out of the bag, so to speak, when George Washington, the Commander in Chief, decided to not really listen to veterans. It was Shay's Rebellion that led to the scrapping of the Articles, the confederation for which some Americans died, and creating a strong Federalist system, wiith a very, very powerful Monarchy that was called a Presidency. Not a Monarchy? Well, look at the electors choosing the POTUS. (The Pope is elected by electors, not all Roman Catholics.) The key changes which make some think it is not a Monarchy involve the idea that there should be "elections" every four years. Before Amendment 22 it was possible for a POTUS to be elected until he died (e.g, FDR). I would not be at all surprised if there was a move by Republicans to scrap Amendment 22 the way Amendment 18 was scrapped by Amendment. DJT is testing the legal limits of the presidency by claiming the US is "at war" when Congress has not declared war, but think of the so-called "war" in Vietnam. It took forever before the military actions were actually deemed to be a real war.
Hyperbolic rhetoric is what I often hear from Jesse Watters. But it is still not exactly the same as "straight up fascism, 1933 style." It may be closer to Italian fascism 1922 style. Remember, that appealed to Henry Ford. (American still drive Ford products, however.) It was only after the Declaration of War against Japan that Ford relented (a bit). To "gerrymander to the tilt" still recognizes there is a "tilt." It does not help to match hyperbolic rhetoric from Jesse since his main goal is to get people to watch Fox commentators. (Some people on Fox's actual news are not prone to such rhetorical tricks.) The rhetoric used by DNC Chair Ken Martin involves tropes that are not at all analytical. Dear Micah Erfan, it is not ultimately productive to "fight fire with fire." That is a partisan statement. To say it is "not about partisanship" and then use a metaphor about "fighting" for "our Constitution" ignores the fact the U.S. Constitution is flawed. My ACLU copy indicates there are 27 Amendments. Yet some think the so-called "founders" received the original Constitution from some kind of infallible source even though the so-called Revolution (or "civil war") of the 1770s and 1780s was based on hyperbolic rhetoric, not honest legal arguments that would have stood up in court. The cat came out of the bag, so to speak, when George Washington, the Commander in Chief, decided to not really listen to veterans. It was Shay's Rebellion that led to the scrapping of the Articles, the confederation for which some Americans died, and creating a strong Federalist system, wiith a very, very powerful Monarchy that was called a Presidency. Not a Monarchy? Well, look at the electors choosing the POTUS. (The Pope is elected by electors, not all Roman Catholics.) The key changes which make some think it is not a Monarchy involve the idea that there should be "elections" every four years. Before Amendment 22 it was possible for a POTUS to be elected until he died (e.g, FDR). I would not be at all surprised if there was a move by Republicans to scrap Amendment 22 the way Amendment 18 was scrapped by Amendment. DJT is testing the legal limits of the presidency by claiming the US is "at war" when Congress has not declared war, but think of the so-called "war" in Vietnam. It took forever before the military actions were actually deemed to be a real war.
Ignore that goddam fool.
And don’t my posts a lot of thought either.
Good job kiddo and I can say kiddo because I am a lot older than you.
#gopdomesticterrorists #gopliesabouteverything
He is such a total Dork. Image any man listening to the likes of Jesse Watters, he is a
shrill, hysterical whiny bitch. The total lack of self awareness that he actually believes he has any inclining of what a real man is. Pathetic.
Jeff Tiedrich's name for Watters is "Fox news 'found object.'"
Sickening!!!